Fans List Review NEW
Fans List is an OnlyFans search engine that matches OnlySeeker in layout, features and design and appears to run an older version of that product, so we tag it as a copycat. Its core search works, with 9/10 on our simple query and 6/10 on our detailed one. Most other features don’t: there are no filters, sorting doesn’t work, and we rate both design and usability as bad.
Score breakdown
Tap a category to see each test. Product tests 21/43 · Audience & engagement 6/12 · Total 27/55
Score out of 10 = points
Score out of 10 = points
Yes (+1) · No (0) · Not working (−1)
Yes (+1) · No (0) · Not working (0)
Yes (+1) · No (0)
Yes / Yes, needs account (+1) · No (0) · Not working (−1)
Yes / Yes, low quality / Paid only (+3) · No (0) · Fake claim (−3)
Yes (+1) · No (0)
Yes (+1) · No (0)
Grid + feed (+1) · Grid, feed or other single view (0)
Yes / Partial / Behind paywall (+1) · No / Not working (0)
Over 1M (+3) · over 500k (+2) · over 100k (+1) · below 100k or no data (0)
Verified (+1) · No claim / Hard to verify (0) · Fake claim (−1)
Weekly / Regular (+1) · Irregular / Rarely / Not updated (0) · Fake claim (−1)
No ads (+1) · Labeled / Partly labeled (0) · Not labeled / Unwanted ads (−2)
Free (+2) · Free + paid plan (+1) · Paywalled (−1)
Good (+1) · Neutral (0) · Bad (−1)
Good (+1) · Neutral (0) · Bad (−1)
Over 80 (+1) · 50–80 (0) · below 50 (−1)
Over 80 (+1) · 50–80 (0) · below 50 (−1)
Over 1M (+5) · over 500k (+4) · over 200k (+3) · over 100k (+2) · over 50k (+1) · under 50k or no data (−5)
Over 30% (+1) · 30% or less (0)
30% or less (+2) · under 50% (+1) · 50–70% (0) · over 70% (−1)
Over 5 (+2) · 2 to 5 (+1) · under 2 (0)
Over 3 min (+2) · 1 to 3 min (+1) · under 1 min (0)
Pros and cons
+ Pros
- +9/10 and 6/10 relevant results (averages 6/10 and 4/10)
- +Natural language and location search work
- +Ads are labeled as sponsored
- +Profile data refreshed regularly
- +Loyal audience: 63% of visits are direct
− Cons
- −Sorting options don’t work
- −No filters, autocomplete, image search, feed or saved lists
- −Design and usability both rated bad
- −PageSpeed 69 on both mobile and desktop
- −1.2 million profile claim is hard to verify
Test screenshots
Taken on fanslist.com in September 2026, logged out, US location.
Claims we checked
What the site says on its own pages, and what we found in our tests.
| What it claims | What we found | Result |
|---|---|---|
| “The best” OF search engine and user finder | Ranked #12 of 45 in our fan ranking | Didn’t hold up |
| 1.2m+ indexed | Hard to verify from the results | Couldn’t verify |
| 400k+ free accounts, 200+ countries, 1k+ added | Not checked separately | Not checked |
| “Advanced Search” | Natural language search works; no filters, and sorting didn’t work | Partly |
| Track creator performance (site description) | Not part of our test | Not checked |
Full review
What Fans List is
Fans List (fanslist.com) was registered in 2026. It matches OnlySeeker in layout, features and design, and our testers found it runs an older version of the OnlySeeker product under a new name. We tag it as a copycat and score it like any other engine. Besides search, it has top lists by country and for free and trial accounts, categories, a blog and creator statistics.
Search quality
Our simple query returned 9 relevant results out of 10 and our detailed query 6 out of 10, both above the 45-engine averages of 6/10 and 4/10. Natural language search works. Search is the one part of the site that works reliably.
Features
Sorting options are there but didn’t work in our test, so they score 0. There are no filters, no autocomplete, no image search, no feed and no way to save creators, and results only show as a grid. Location search and natural language search did work. It earns 2 of 11 feature points, even though the homepage links to an “Advanced Search”.
Data
The homepage says 1.2 million+ accounts are indexed, including 400,000+ free ones across 200+ countries. We couldn’t verify those figures from the results. Profile details we compared with live OnlyFans pages were refreshed regularly.
Ads and pricing
Fans List is free. Sponsored creators appear among the results with a “Sponsored” label, so paid placements are easy to spot. Labeled ads score 0 points; only engines with no ads at all score higher.
Speed and usability
This is its weakest area. We rate both design and usability as bad, because most options outside the search box don’t work. PageSpeed Insights scored the homepage 69 on mobile and 69 on desktop.
Audience and engagement
Similarweb estimates about 111,000 visits a month, mostly from the US. 63% of visits are direct, meaning people type the address or use a bookmark, and 22% come from organic search; 3% come from adult sites. The bounce rate is 40%, with 3 pages and 1 minute per visit. It earns 6 of 12 audience points.
Who it’s for
Fans who already use it and only need a working search box. For keyword search with filters and sorting that work, OnlySearch (#5, 58) is the closer fit.
Advertising on Fans List
About 94k of its monthly visits come from search and direct traffic, and 3% come from adult sites. Ads are sold through PUR Agency.
How to advertise on Fans List
We found no ad page on Fans List itself. It sells placements through PUR Agency, OnlyFinder’s ad network (onlyfinder-ads.com), priced per click (CPC, cost per click). We found no pay-per-subscriber option (CPL, cost per subscriber) and no free listing. Removal requests go to [email protected].
Fans List advertising prices
Prices follow PUR Agency’s: $0.40 to $1.50 per click, an average of $0.95, with a $500 minimum deposit. They’re shown in an advertiser account, not publicly. At $0.95, $500 buys roughly 530 clicks.
Fans List traffic for advertisers
About 111,000 visits a month, of which about 94,000 are search-intent visits, most of them direct. 3% come from adult sites. Engagement is moderate: 40% bounce rate, 3 pages and 1 minute per visit.
Is advertising on Fans List worth it?
Fans List ranks #10 of 27 with a creator score of 53/100. PUR Agency is our highest-rated network (+4), the audience is loyal and mostly from the US, and adult-site traffic is low. Against that, the audience is small, prices aren’t public and the minimum is $500. Ask PUR Agency which sites a $500 deposit covers before you commit.
Creator score breakdown
Monthly visits × (organic + direct + paid search share). These are people actively looking for creators, not traffic bought from other sites.
Bounce rate, pages per visit and visit duration, scored the same way as in the fan ranking.
Share of visits referred from adult sites. This traffic usually converts poorly to paying subscribers.
The country most visits come from. Fans in Tier 1 countries spend more on average.
Our rating of where ads end up, for each ad network. An engine sold through several networks gets the best rating. Reasons are on the methodology page.
How easy and cheap it is to start: whether ads are sold, whether prices are public, the average cost per click and the minimum deposit.
Whether creators can add a profile for free and ask for removal.
The engine’s product-test points, scaled. Better engines keep visitors engaged, so ads convert better.
Pricing source: PUR Agency / OnlyFinder network: same pricing as OnlyFinder ($0.40–$1.50 CPC, $500 min). Not public on onlyfinder-ads.com; from your OnlyFinder data
Advertising on Fans List: FAQ
How much does it cost to advertise on Fans List?
Clicks average $0.95 ($0.40–$1.50) through PUR Agency, with a $500 minimum deposit. Prices aren’t public.
Can I pay per subscriber on Fans List?
We found no pay-per-subscriber (CPL) option.
How much traffic does Fans List get?
About 111,000 visits a month according to Similarweb (September 2026), mostly from the US. About 94,000 are search-intent visits.
Where do I buy ads on Fans List?
Through PUR Agency, OnlyFinder’s ad network, at onlyfinder-ads.com.
Top alternatives to advertise on
Fans List alternatives
Fans List FAQ
Is Fans List free?
Yes. Fans List is free to use.
Does Fans List show ads?
Yes, and they’re labeled as ads.
Does Fans List have image search?
No.
How accurate is Fans List?
It scored 9/10 on our simple query and 6/10 on our detailed query. The average across all 45 engines is 6/10 and 4/10.